Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2021 (12) TMI 697

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssed by the learned CIT(A), in the matter of assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2010-11. Grievances raised by the appellant Assessing Officer are as follows: 1. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in not appreciating the existence of commercial relation between the assessee and M/s Ahuja Group?" 2. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in not appreciating the evidentiary value of statement of Shri Jagdish Bhagwandas recorded u/s 132(4) of the IT Act, 1961?" 3. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in considering the interest income amounting to Rs. 4,47,150/- to be taxable under article 22 of India-UAE DTAA not under article 11of the treaty?" 4. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition amounting to Rs. 2,50,40,000/- citing article 22 of India- UAE treaty without appreciating that Article 22 of the India- UAE treaty provides for taxability of income arising from immo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e legal position. 5. Let us, first of all, consider as to what is the basic nature of the transaction, which has resulted in the impugned tax liability. The assessee is said to have, even going by the claim of the revenue authorities, paid some unaccounted monies to the builder, and, by a fiction of law, these unaccounted or unexplained investments are being brought to tax. The trigger for taxability is thus investment in the immoveable property- unexplained investment at that. Bearing this in mind, let us now see the treaty provisions under which this income can be brought to tax in the hands of the assessee- in terms of the provisions of the Indo UAE tax treaty, as there is no dispute that the assessee is, being resident in and fiscally domiciled in the UAE, entitled to the benefits of the Indo UAE tax treaty. We are right now dealing with an assessment year in which tax residency certificate was not even mandatory, but quite fairly, that aspect has not even been raised before us. Coming to the taxability under the Indo UAE tax treaty, such an income is not specifically taxed under any of the heads in the tax treaty in question. That brings us to the residuary head of income, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arned Departmental Representative seem to suggest, for taxation by virtue of investment in the immovable property. Explaining the scope of similar provision, the OECD Model Convention Commentary, which is quoted with approval in UN Model Convention Commentary, states as follows: 1. This Article deals only with taxes on capital, to the exclusion of taxes on estates and inheritances and on gifts and of transfer duties. Taxes on capital to which the Article applies are those referred to in Article 2. 2. Taxes on capital generally constitute complementary taxation of income from capital. Consequently, taxes on a given element of capital can be levied, in principle, only by the State which is entitled to tax the income from this element of capital. 7. Clearly, therefore, article 23(1) has no application in the present context. What is impugned before us is not a taxation on capital represented by an immoveable property but taxation on account of a part of investment in an immovable property being unexplained. Since a tax on capital is a tax on assets rather than a tax on income, wealth tax, which is covered by article 2(b)(iii) could at best be covered by the same, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ws of the UAE, the amounts in question can be treated as of income nature, the tax implications of these amounts, under the scheme of the Indo UAE tax treaty, can at best follow in the UAE, but that is not relevant in the present context of holding these amounts to be, even if so permissible in our domestic tax laws, taxable in India. The revenue thus derives no support from the Indo UAE tax treaty, which, under the scheme of Section 90(2), must make way to the domestic law provisions except to the extent the applicable treaty provisions are 'more' favourable to the assessee. 13. As for the alleged interest income, there is no finding whatsoever to suggest that there was indeed any interest income inasmuch as even the Assessing Officer is tentative when he states that the related entry "probably" refers to interest receipt. The taxability of interest is, even by the standards of the revenue authorities, also thus far from established. There is no evidence whatsoever, or even a serious allegation, that there is an interest income. 14. Learned counsel, however, has much more armoury in defence of the conclusions arrived at by the learned CIT(A). It is his case that all investme....