2021 (7) TMI 1294

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tioner: Mr. Shankh Sengupta, Ms. Varuna Bhanrale, Mr. Sahil Mendiratta, and Ms. Angelika Awasthi, Advs. for Official Liquidator. Respondents: Ms. Anuradha Dutt, Adv. Mr. Pawan Sharma, Adv. Ms. Priyanka MP, Adv. Mr. Chaitanya Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Ambar Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Shobhit Ahuja, Adv. Advs. for Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited for applicants/ M/s. Devas Employees Mauritius Private Lim....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....passed on 27.02.2017, which order came to be confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority on 11.10.2017. However, before the said order was confirmed, the petitioner company had approached the Karnataka High Court by way of a writ petition, which petition came to be rejected on 06.10.2017. The aforesaid dismissal order has been admittedly assailed by the petitioner company by way of a writ appeal, whic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed the Adjudicating Authority with an application contending therein that since no fresh order had been passed within 180 days' time as stipulated by the Tribunal vide its order dated 11.09.2019, no orders confirming the attachment order could be passed. 4. The said plea of the petitioner having been rejected vide order dated 13.11.2020, the present petition came to be filed soon thereafte....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y opposed by Mr. Shankh Sengupta, who appears for the Official Liquidator, by contending and in my view rightly so, that as on date, it is the Official Liquidator alone who can represent the company. Mr. Shankh Sengupta, however, does not dispute the fact that proceedings in respect of the provisional attachment order are still pending before the Karnataka High Court and therefore, prays that the ....