Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2021 (12) TMI 125

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Isha Malik, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Pooja Mahajan, Mr. Savar Mahajan & Ms. Srishti Kapoor, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Giriraj Subramanium & Mr. Simarpal Singh Sawhney, Advs. for R-2. ORDER CM APPL. 35688/2021 & CM APPL. 35689/2021 (lengthy synopsis and list of dates) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The applications are d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nder the SARFAESI Act. Furthermore, the impugned order passed by the Tribunal on 30.09.2021 was based on a presumption that the possession of the subject properties was still with the Corporate Debtor/respondent no. 2, which presumption was erroneous as noted by the Tribunal itself in its subsequent order dated 05.10.2021, but still the Tribunal has failed to vacate the interim order and that too ....