2019 (10) TMI 1479

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... plaintiff. Sh. Deepak Vuttsya, Advocate for defendant no. 1. Sh. Sharad, Advocate for defendant no. 2. Arguments on application u/o 1 Rule 10 CPC heard. Learned Sh. Sharad has submitted that defendant no. 2 is not a necessary party as the suit is based upon agreement which was entered into between plaintiff and defendant no. 1. Entire goods were supplied to defendant no. 1. Cheque for....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....no. 2 had no obligation to do so. Arguments considered. It is rightly submitted by learned Sh. Deepak that at this stage it would not be proper to strike out defendant no. 2 and defendant no. 2 appears to be proper party because firstly a letter purportedly issued by defendant no. 2 asking plaintiff to supply particulars for issuance of C­Form is on record. This prima facie reflects that....