Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (4) TMI 1227

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... repayable in half yearly installments in seven years with interest @ 12.50% on six monthly rests. On failure of defendant No. 1 in timely repayment of the instalments with interest and expenditure, notices were served. However, when the defendants failed to repay the installments even after receipt of notices, recovery proceedings were initiated before the Tehsildar in the year 1993 as per provisions of the M.P. Public Money Recovery Act and the same were, subsequently, withdrawn. It was also averred that defendant No. 1 executed a promissory note promising to repay the entire loan amount in lump sum as per loan account acknowledging balance of loan vide acknowledgments dated 14-8-1995, 24-7-1996 and 30-1-1997. Defendant No. 1 had mortgaged her 29.45 acre of agricultural land in favour of the Bank by depositing the documents described in Schedule B annexed with the plaint as additional security against the loan. Defendants Nos. 3 & 4 had also equitably mortgaged their property described in Schedules C & D. Defendant No. 1 had executed an Acknowledgment of Debt at the time of disbursal of loan and renewed the Acknowledgment of Debt in the year 1991 & 12th May, 1994 and accepted her....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... suit on the ground of limitation while deciding the issue No. 17 in the affirmative. Finding on issue No. 17 is not in accordance with law. From perusal of the loan account statement of the tractor loan No. 110/85, filed and proved by the plaintiff by exhibiting it through the Branch Manager, it would be evident that the defendant No. 1 had deposited various amounts towards repayment of loan in her loan account and thus, on each payment, limitation got extended by three years as per provisions of Article 1 read with Sections 18 and 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (in short "Act, 1963"). Article 1 of the Act, 1963 provides that in a suit relating to accounts for the balance due on a mutual, open and current account, where there have been reciprocal demands between the parties, the period of limitation is three years from the close of the year, in which the last item admitted or proved is entered in the account, such year to be computed as in the account. In the instant case, the last payment of Rs. 19,000/- has been made on 16-4-1996 and the suit has been filed on 12-2-1997 and therefore, the limitation for filing the suit got extended for a period of three years from 16-4-1996. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g finding against issue No. 17? 11. We have heard learned Counsel for the appellant/plaintiff and perused the oral and documentary evidence available on record, including the impugned judgment of the trial Court. 12. From the pleadings in the plaint and oral and documentary evidence available on record, we find that defendant No. 1 applied for loan of Rs. 1 lac for the purchase of tractor and trolley and other agricultural accessories vide Ex. P. 1. She also submitted Search Report with respect to 29.45 acres of her agricultural land vide Ex. P.2. Revenue papers (copy of B-1 and map) of the land i.e. Ex. P.4, P.5 and P.6, were also filed by the loanee with her application for loan. Her husband had submitted his consent vide Ex. P.7. Defendants Nos. 1 and 2 had executed a deed of hypothecation of standing crops over their agricultural land on 22-7-1985 vide Ex. P. 10. Defendants Nos. 3 and 4 had executed a deed of guarantee to secure the loan advanced to the principal debtor vide P. 12. As per Clause 5 of the Term Loan Agreement of Hypothecation (Ex.P.11), loan of Rs. 1 lac advanced to defendant No. 1 was repayable within seven years in half yearly, instalments of Rs. 7150/....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....by the Branch Manager and an endorsement to this effect is present at the foot of the statement of account. "Certified copy" is defined under the provisions of the Banker's Books Evidence Act, 1891 (in short "Act, 1891)"), which reads as under: 2(8) "Certified copy" means a copy of any entry in the books of a bank together with a certificate written at the foot of such copy that it is a true copy of such entry, that such entry is contained in one of the ordinary books of the bank and was made in the usual and ordinary course of business, and that such book is still in the custody of the bank and where the copy was obtained by a mechanical or other process which in itself ensured the accuracy of the copy, a further certificate to that effect, but where the book from which such copy was prepared has been destroyed in the usual course of the bank's business after the date on which the copy had been so prepared, a further certificate to that effect, each such certificate being dated and subscribed by the principal accountant or manager of the bank with his name and official title. Section 4 of the Act, 1891 reads thus: 4. Subject to the provisions of ....