2018 (4) TMI 1893
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ition is for quashing of the order dated 10.04.2018 passed by the trial Court in FIR No.664 dated 19.10.2016 under Sections 406, 420, 506, 34 IPC, vide which the permission was declined to the petitioner to visit abroad from 19.04.2018 to 15.05.2018. Notice of motion. On asking of the Court, Ms. Harpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Learned counsel ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....an is likely to be presented, it will not be appropriate to grant permission to the accused (petitioner herein) to leave the country for visiting abroad. Counsel for the petitioner has further argued that the petitioner is a businessman and in his ordinary course of business, he has to travel abroad. It is further submitted that the petitioner is engaged in the business of import and expo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., the impugned order dated 10.04.2018 passed by the trial Court is set-aside and the petitioner is granted permission to travel abroad from 19.04.2018 to 15.05.2018 subject to deposit of Rs. 2,00,000/- with the trial Court. The petitioner shall also furnish an undertaking that in case he fail to return back to India or appear before the trial Court within time, the said amount will be forfeited to....
TaxTMI