TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2021 (11) TMI 676
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....se of the same by this common order. 3. For the sake of convenience and clarity, the facts relevant to the appeal in ITA No. 1818/PUN/2018 are stated herein. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are as under:- The appellant is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. During the financial year 2012-13, the appellant company had submitted statements of tax deducted at source belatedly. The CPC (TDS) had issued an intimation dated 02.10.2016 levying late fees u/s. 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') for belated submission of TDS statements of Rs. 53,800/-, Rs. 9,000/-, Rs. 35,400/- and Rs. 11,400/-. 5. Being aggrieved, an appeal was preferred before the ld. CIT(A), who vide impugne....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... levied only prospectively w.e.f. 01.06.2015. The relevant observation of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Fatheraj Singhvi (supra) are extracted hereunder:- "19. Hence, it can be said that, the mechanism provided for enforceability of Section 200(3) or 206C (3) for filing of the statement by making it penal under Section 272A (2) (k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege to the defaulter to come out from the rigors of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....red before such provisions is held to be retroactive in nature. Further, when any provision is inserted for liability to pay any tax or the fee by way of compensatory in nature or fee independently simultaneously mode and the manner of its enforceability is also required to be considered and examined. Not only that, but, if the mode and the manner is not expressly prescribed, the provisions may also be vulnerable. All such aspects will be required to be considered before one considers regulatory mechanism or provision for regulating the mode and the manner of recovery and its enforceability as retroactive. If at the time when the fee was provided under Section 234E, the Parliament also provided for its utility for giving privilege under Sec....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ll not permit the deductor to reopen the said question unless he has made payment under protest. 23. In view of the aforesaid observation and discussion, since the impugned intimation given by the respondent-Department against all the appellants under Section 200A are so far as they are for the period prior to 1.6.2015 can be said as without any authority under law. Hence, the same can be said as illegal and invalid. 24. If the facts of the present cases are examined in light of the aforesaid observation and discussion, it appears that in all matters, the intimation given in purported exercise of power under Section 200A are in respect of fees under Section 234E for the period prior to 1.6.2015. As such, it is on account o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tional validity under Section 234E of the Act. At this stage, we may also record that the learned counsels appearing for the appellant had also declared that if the impugned notices under Section 200A are set aside, so far as it relates to computation and intimation for payment of fee under Section 234E, the appellant-petitioners would not press the challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 234E of the Act. But, they submitted that the question of constitutional validity of Section 234E may be kept open to be considered by the Division Bench and the Judgment of the learned Single Judge may not conclude the constitutional validity of Section 234E of the Act. 26. Under these circumstances, we find that no further discussion....