2021 (8) TMI 1242
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., W.P.(C) 5424/2020 & CM APPL. 19579/2020, W.P.(C) 5643/2020 & CM APPL. 20442/2020 And Ors. - -<br>PMLA<br>Justice Prathiba M. Singh W.P.(C) 5657/2020 & CM APPL. 20476/2020, W.P.(C) 5671/2020 & CM APPLs. 20522/2020, 5852/2021, W.P.(C) 5713/2020 & CM APPLs. 20656/2020, 31384/2020, 4153/2021, W.P.(C) 5797/2020 & CM APPL. 20969/2020, W.P.(C) 5855/2020 & CM APPL. 21152/2020, W.P.(C) 6499/2020 & CM APPL. 22801/2020, W.P.(C) 7034/2020 & CM APPL. 23978/2020, W.P.(C) 7210/2020 & CM APPL. 24370/2020, W.P.(C) 7801/2020 & CM APPL. 25677/2020, W.P.(C) 7835/2020 & CM APPL. 25731/2020 And W.P.(C) 9384/2020 & CM APPL. 30224/2020 For the Petitioners: Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Mr. Mudit Jain, Mr. Hardik Sharma, Mr. Yugant Sharma & Mr. Talib Khan, Ad....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....man Ali, Mr. Mohammad Shahan Ulla & Mr. Kaushal Kait, Advocates., Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms., Manisha Saroha, Advocate for R-1., Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Ms. Ananya Khanna, Advocate for ED., Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr., Farman Ali, Mr. Mohammad Shahan Ulla & Mr. Kaushal Kait, Advocates., Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr., Farman Ali, Mr. Mohammad Shahan Ulla & Mr. Kaushal Kait, Advocates., Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Ms. Ananya Khanna, Advocate for ED. ORDER 1. This hearing has been done through video conferencing. 2. These petitions have been filed by the Petitioners seeking various reliefs in respect of the proceedings initiated by the Directorate of Enforcement (hereinafter as 'ED'), wherein the bank accounts of the Petition....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eafter, all the Petitioners filed their respective replies before the Adjudicating Authority, on the basis of whatever record/ documents that were available, and whatever they could decipher on their own. Hearings were then conducted before the Adjudicating Authority, against which there are large number of grievances which have been canvassed by the Petitioners. 4. In sum and substance, the grievance of the Petitioners is multifold - including that the ED did not proceed in accordance with the statutory provisions including Section 60 while conducting the Search & seizure operations as also before issuing orders under Section 17. It is also urged in these petitions, that that the "reasons to believe", under the PMLA, were not provided by ....