Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (11) TMI 117

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... : B. Narasimha Sarma ORDER: This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.171 of 2010 on the file of the Special Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad. The petitioners herein are A1 to A4. The offences alleged against them are under Sections 9 and 9 AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 2. On 13.12.2011, this Court, while admitting the criminal pe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ice. However, the respondent vide order dated 22.05.2008, has determined the liability as Rs. 90,72,736/- towards the alleged irregular availment of CENVAT credit along with interest thereon and penalties, without giving proper opportunity and even without considering their case in proper perspective. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioners filed statutory appeals vide File Nos.E/13 to 15 of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... finality. 5. The petitioners stated that they preferred appeals against the order dated 22.05.2008 on depositing certain amounts and also in the writ petition, the amount was reduced and they have complied with the said order. They further stated that the issue of validity of the proceedings dated 22.05.2008 has to be examined by the statutory appellate Tribunal and thus, C.C., is nothing but ab....