2021 (11) TMI 117

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Prabhakar Rao Respondent Advocate : B. Narasimha Sarma ORDER: This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.171 of 2010 on the file of the Special Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad. The petitioners herein are A1 to A4. The offences alleged against them are under Sections 9 and 9 AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 2. On 13.12.2011, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ice. The petitioners gave reply to the said notice. However, the respondent vide order dated 22.05.2008, has determined the liability as Rs. 90,72,736/- towards the alleged irregular availment of CENVAT credit along with interest thereon and penalties, without giving proper opportunity and even without considering their case in proper perspective. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioners filed....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... be stayed till the disputed proceedings attain finality. 5. The petitioners stated that they preferred appeals against the order dated 22.05.2008 on depositing certain amounts and also in the writ petition, the amount was reduced and they have complied with the said order. They further stated that the issue of validity of the proceedings dated 22.05.2008 has to be examined by the statutory app....