Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (12) TMI 1043

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....RANGANATHAN For the Petitioner : CH PUSHYAM KIRAN For the Respondent : BATHULA RAJKIRANSC FOREXCISECUSTOMS ORAL ORDER: (Per GR, J) The writ petition is primarily directed against the order dated 21-12-2009/14-12-2009 rejecting the application No.E/Misc./514-516/2009 in Appeal No.E/13-15/2009. The first petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacture of Mild steel ingots. The petitioner....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Central Excise Act,1944 apart from personal penalty on the Managing Director and Director of the Company (who are petitioner Nos.2 and 3). The petitioners preferred an appeal against the order of the 1st respondent above to the 2nd respondent- Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal on 02-01-2009 and along therewith an application for waiver of pre-deposit of the duty and penalty. The peti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ers' on merits no interference was called for. It appears from the record that the earlier order communicated on 28-10-2009 directing deposit of entire duty and 10% of the penalty was passed in the absence of petitioners' counsel on the relevant date of hearings namely 06-10-2009 and 08-10-2009 in view of the asserted illhealth of the counsel as supported by medical certificates, the petitioners ....