2021 (10) TMI 1113

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... further proceedings in the said Calendar Case. 2. E.O.C.C.No.68 of 2013 had been preferred by the respondent/complainant alleging offences under Sections 276CC, 276C(1) and 276C(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2005-2006/financial year 2004-2005. 3. In the complaint, it had been stated that the present petitioners, A2 and A3 are partners of A1. It had been stated that there was search and seizure operations on 26.10.2005 under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in the premises of the second petitioner/A2. It is claimed that various incriminating documents had been seized. Thereafter, the returns of the income for the assessment year 2005-2006 should have been filed on or before 31.08.2005. It was actually ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rt the case of the Revenue. In the circumstances, on the admitted fact herein that the search is one being in the residential premises of the partner, there being no recovery of either cash or any amount seized from the assessee and there being no allegation that the books of accounts showed inaccurate particulars of income or concealed the particulars of income, the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the same is set aside. 14. In the result, the Tax Case Appeal is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P is closed." 8. Subsequent, to the order of the Division Bench, the Tax Recovery Officer, Central - II, Chennai, by a letter, dated 15.11.2014 had, in my opinion, very pruden....