2021 (10) TMI 972

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Petitioner : Mr. S.P. Sarangi, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Mr. S.S. Mohapatra, Standing Counsel ORDER 1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode, in the Vacation Court. 2. The impugned order dated 21st January 2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in ITA No.418/CTK/2018, has rejected the Petitioner's prayer for condon....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....incing to this Court at all. As long as the Petitioner did have a grievance on merits against the impugned order of the CIT (Appeals), it ought to have preferred an appeal before the ITAT in reasonable time without having to await the decision of the CIT (A), Mysore. In any event, the extraordinary delay of 2554 days cannot be condoned on such a weak explanation given by the Petitioner. 6. In a....