Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2021 (9) TMI 1257

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....paying duty of BCD @ 7.5% and CVD nil. Out of the 9 bills of entry, 8 bills of entry were facilitated through RMS. During audit, it appeared to the department that HSN Notes under the CTH 8428 clearly specifies that all types of conveyors and elevators used for transporting grains, straw, hay, sawdust etc. are to be classified under the Tariff Heading 8428. That appellants are not eligible for the concessional rate of duty as the goods are to be classified under CTH 8428. Demand notice was issued proposing to reclassify the subject goods under 8428 and to demand short-paid duty. The appellant replied on 2.5.2011 inter alia stating that the goods being part of feed mill machinery are rightly classifiable under CTH 84379090 where the duty is ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d in 2019 (365) ELT 944 (Tri. Chand.). This decision also was affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2019 (368) ELT A225 (SC). Similar view was taken by the Tribunal in the case of Sona Foods (India) Vs. CCE reported in 2019 (368) ELT 162 (Tri. All.). The said decision has been affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court as reported in 2019 (368) ELT A50 (SC). He prayed that the appeal may be allowed. 4. The learned AR Shri S. Balakumar supported the findings in the impugned order. 5. Heard both sides. 6. The issue involved is with regard to the classification of 'screw / drag conveyors and bucket elevators" imported by the appellant. The learned counsel has described the nature of the bucket elevators and conveyors im....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... hoists u 12% 842820 - Pneumatic elevators and conveyors:       --- Conveyors :     84282011 ---- Belt conveyors u 12% 84282019 ---- Other u 12% 84282020 --- Pneumatic elevators u 12%   - Other continuous-action elevators and conveyors, for goods or materials :     84283100 -- Specially designed for underground use u 12% 84283200 -- Other, bucket type u 12% 84283300 -- Other, belt type u 12% 84283900 -- Other u 12% 84284000 - Escalators and moving walkways u 12% 84286000 - Teleferics, chair-lifts, ski-ragli....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ame issue was analyzed by the Tribunal in the case of Annapurna Agronics Machinery Pvt. Ltd. (supra). The discussions made in the case of Alpsco Graintech Pvt. Ltd. cited supra was quoted in the said decision, which reads as under:- "7. We further take a note of the fact that in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Kanpur v. Rationale Iron & Steel Co. (supra), this Tribunal has categorically observed that explanatory notes have no force of law and they are only for guidance whereas the findings of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) is on the basis of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 enacted by Indian Parliament. Therefore, it was held that the ground raised by the Revenue is not sustainable. Admittedly, in the case in hand, the r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Auto International Ltd. (supra) wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court observed as if the items specifically made for specific machine would be classifiable as part of the said machine and not under the general heading. Admittedly, in the case in hand, the conveyors and elevators are for specific use of rice milling industry and nowhere else, in that circumstances, the same merits classification as per the rice milling machinery under tariff heading No. 8437. 9. The Ld. AR heavily relied on the decision of Eminence Equipments Pvt. Ltd. (supra) to say that conveyors and elevators used for rice mills is to be classified under chapter heading No. 8428. We have gone through the facts in the case of Eminence Equipments Pvt. Ltd. (supra) was no....