Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1985 (10) TMI 47

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and shown on the assets side of the balance-sheet should not be deducted from the excess provision for taxation in valuing the shares of M/s. International Instruments (P) Ltd.? " In order to appreciate the question, it is necessary in the first instance to notice the facts as found by the Tribunal. The assessee as an individual held equity shares in M/s. International Instruments Pvt. Ltd. For the assessment year 1974-75, the assessee declared in his return under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 ("the Act"), before the Wealth-tax Officer the value of the equity shares held by him at Rs. 220,24 per share. On January 22, 1977, the Wealth-tax Officer completed the assessment determining the share value at Rs. 315,26 per share and subjected the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... CWT [1984] 148 ITR 620. Mr. G. Sarangan, learned counsel appearing for the assessee, laying great emphasis upon the words " other than the amount referred to in clause (i)(a) " occurring in rule ID of the Rules and the meaning attached to the words " other than " in the law lexicon contended that it refers to the provision for taxation other than the provision for advance tax and they do not mean the amount paid as advance tax under the Income-tax Act. In support of his contention, Mr. Sarangan has strongly relied on Division Bench ruling of the Gujarat High Court in CWT v. Ashok K. Parikh [1981] 129 ITR 46. Rule ID of the Rules that is material reads thus: " ID. The market value of an unquoted equity share of any company, other t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the total liability as determined on completion of an assessment. Now, coming to clause (ii)(e) of Explanation II, it is clear that it deals with liability. Exclusion of advance tax from the total assets under clause (i)(a) is not to be confused with the provision for the total tax payable by the company, which is referred to in clause (ii)(e) as a liability. The advance tax has to be paid during the accounting year of the company. It has already been paid daring the accounting year and all that remains is its adjustment against the total tax due. Advance tax paid is on the assets side of the balance-sheet and that amount is embedded in the full provision for tax which appears on the liabilities side. If the advance tax as an asset is taken....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to " other than " in Black's Law Dictionary, 5th edition, and Stroud's judicial Dictionary (111 volume, IV Edition) cannot be properly applied in the context of the Rules. In Ashok Kumar Oswal v. CWT [1984] 148 ITR 620, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana had occasion to examine a similar question and expressed thus (at P. 624) : " In sub-clause (e), the words 'the tax payable with reference to the book profits' are important. These words connote the amount of tax due from a company after deducting the advance tax and not the whole of the amount of tax worked out on the book profits. A provision for taxation is made in the balance-sheet under rules of accountancy and not under any rule of law. The liability of a company to pay tax i....