2015 (8) TMI 1533
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Shanker, Adv., Ms. A. Shivani, Adv., Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Samir Ali Khan, Adv. ORDER 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 29th June, 2012 of the High Court of Patna passed in Crl. Misc. No.31533 of 2008 by which the High Court refused to quash the criminal proceedings against the appellants under Sections 403/406/420/467/471/389 ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... A reading of the charge-sheet does not refer to any specific finding of investigation. 5. Taking into account the contents of the FIR, we are left with the impression that the said allegations are bald and omnibus and do not make any specific reference to the role of the appellants in any alleged conspiracy. In Central Bureau of Investigation versus K. Narayana Rao [(2012) 9 SCC 512] to which o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....es an "unremitting loyalty" to the interests of the client and it is the lawyer's responsibility to act in a manner that would best advance the interest of the client. Merely because his opinion may not be acceptable, he cannot be mulcted with the criminal prosecution, particularly, in the absence of tangible evidence that he associated with other conspirators. At the most, he may be liable for gr....