Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1985 (9) TMI 29

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ly followed by the assessee, the lease amount of Rs. 2,50,000 which was receivable in 10 yearly instalments as per agreement dated November 5, 1975, was not taxable in the assessment year 1976-77 ? " M/s. Barjatya Family Charitable Trust, the assessee, was carrying on business of cinematograph film distribution during the assessment year 1976-77. The assessee entered into an agreement dated November 5, 1975, whereby it leased out the right of distribution, exhibition and exploitation in respect of various pictures mentioned in the said agreement to M/s. Rajshree Pictures Pvt. Ltd. on the terms and conditions set out in the said agreement. A supplementary agreement was arrived at on November 12, 1975, wherein the assessee disclosed the na....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....profit amount. According to the Income-tax Officer, the provision for payment which is cleared in instalments spread over a period of ten years was merely a facility allowed by the lessor to the lessee for the payment of consideration which had assumed the character of an outstanding debt on March 1, 1976, and the transaction was completed in all respects in pursuance of the terms of the agreement dated November 5, 1975. The said order of the Income-tax Officer was affirmed in appeal by the Commissioner of Income-tax (A), Rajasthan, Jaipur, by order dated January 8, 1980. Thereafter the assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal which was allowed by the Tribunal by order dated September 29, 1980. The Tribunal has observed that it was not ....