2018 (2) TMI 2041

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... For the Respondent : Mr. Pranjal Srivastava, Advocate. ORDER The question of law sought to be urged by the Revenue is "whether the ITAT fell into error in deleting the amount added, i.e., Rs. 5,62,61,726/- by the Assessing Officer pursuant to a search under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In this case the search took place in the premises on 03.10.2013. A notice under Sectio....