TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2019 (1) TMI 1910
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....H AND Mr. B.PUGALENDHI, JJ. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramesh For Respondents : Mr.V.R.Shanmuganathan, Spl.G.P. For R1 to R4, R8 Mr.S.Hajamohideen Gisthi for R5 to R7, R13 to 17, R19, 21, 22, 23, R26, R29, R31 to R33, R35, 38 to 42, 44, 45,49, 50 54, 56, 62, 64, 65, 68, 70, 76, 78, 80, 85, 86 88, 90, 92, 97, 101, 102 to 104 No appearance for R28, 37, 48, 60, 61, 67, 77, 79, 83, 91, 99, 108, 107 Mr.M....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....le at Sankaran Kovil and also for other charities. The said property was purchased by the petitioner's father in the year 1985. As the said land had been acquired under Land Reforms Act, the Trust made necessary application before the Government and by G.O.No.906 of 1995 the said land were restored. Whileso, in the year 1985, people at Konganthanparai Village claiming title against the Trust h....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ation and mandatory injunction. On 28.04.2016 the suits were decreed. Against which, the respondents 5 to 7 have preferred an appeal in A.S.Nos.84 and 85 of 2016 before this Court and this Court by order dated 19.09.2016 granting interim order directed the respondents 5 to 108 not to alter the physical features of the subject properties and also not to create any right in favour of the third parti....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....l Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents submitted that as an order of interim direction was granted in A.S.Nos.84 http://www.judis.nic.in and 85 of 2016 by this Court and the said appeals are pending, the respondents are unable to take further action against the unauthorized construction in the above said properties. He also submitted that the Local Planning Authorities have al....