2018 (9) TMI 2039

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....IONERS: SRI J VISHNU VARDHAN COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS: SRI K LAKSHMAN (ASST SOLICITOR GENERAL) ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri K.Lakshman, learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing for respondents 1 and 2. Learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing for respondents 1 & 2 submits that the 2nd respondent-ROC has filed appeal against the judgment of in WP Nos. 14....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....018 goes to show that the issue raised before the High Court of Bombay is not the same issue raised in the present writ petition. The issue raised in the present writ petition is almost covered by the judgment of High Court of Madras and that as on today and that though it is stated that appeal is filed, no stay granted against judgment of High Court of Madras. Prima facie, this Court is of the p....