2021 (7) TMI 429
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r.TNC.Kaushik Government Advocate ORDER Heard Mr.S.Ramanan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.TNC.Kaushik, learned Government Advocate for the respondents. 2. The petitioner challenges order dated 22.07.2020 rejecting its request for refund. The petitioner is an registered assessee on the files of the State Tax Officer/sole respondent under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (in....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ccount and this would account for mismatch. Had a personal hearing been afforded to the petitioner prior to adjudication of the request for refund, this point would have been explained. However, since the impugned order has come to be passed without affording an opportunity of personal hearing, this point has not been putforth to the respondent for consideration effectively. 4. Moreover, the im....
TaxTMI