Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1986 (9) TMI 65

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the order passed by the Tax Recovery Officer, Sambalpur Circle, under rule 11 of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961, directing sale of the property under attachment. Proceedings initiated under the Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act for recovery of tax for the years 1951-52 to 1958-59 proved abortive, on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....egorically state that demand notices for the years 1951-52 to 1954-55 were at all served. It has further been argued that service of notice on the receiver, who had been appointed by the court during pendency of the writ application filed by the late Biswanath Singh Deo challenging the vesting of the estate, did not amount to service of demand notice on the assessee or on his legal representatives....