Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2021 (7) TMI 161

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rized Representative (A.R.) for the Respondent ORDER The present appeals have been filed by the assessee against Order-in-Appeal Seaport C.Cus. II No. 814-819/2020 dated 12.06.2020 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II), Chennai. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, Shri Prabhad Dobriyal, Learned Advocate, appeared for the assessee-appellant and Shri M. Jagan Babu, Lea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....made a representation to the Norms Committee to modify the restored SION for Amoxicillin Tri hydrate, but the Committee did not consider favourably and directed the appellant to follow restored SION; (iii) In 2009, the appellant approached Jt. DGFT, Hyderabad for clubbing of said four Advance Licences on payment of applicable penalty as per HBP. However, the same was rejected by Jt. DGFT,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 5,03,605/- vide TR6 Challan No. MCM0021191 dated 15.02.2018; (vi) In view of the factual position that the CVD and SAD paid by them could not be taken as credit, the appellant filed refund applications seeking refund of the same under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962; (vii) That the Adjudicating Authority rejected the refund claims;  (viii) Aggrieved by the ord....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f M/s. Paros Electronics (P) Ltd. v. Union of India reported in 1996 (83) E.L.T. 261 (S.C.), while dealing with the above provision, has inter alia held that: "2. ... ... If the application is under Section 27 of the Act then the authority, being a creation of the statute, must act within the ambit of that provision and if the application is delayed he has no alternative but to r....