Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2021 (7) TMI 130

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....m has grossly erred in making additions of Rs. 19,41,740/ on the basis of writing on loose sheets and admission extracted under coercion and under influence during the course of survey proceedings; 3. For that the additions are not backed by any cohesive primary and circumstantial evidence as to its nature and its source. The persons from whom receipts have been purported to be made are unidentifiable, not-existent and are thus a sham and imaginary transaction; 4. For that the Id. below forum has not applied his mind judicial conclude to the case; 5. For that the survey proceedings u/s,133A of the IT Act, 1961 itself have been conducted in a manner defying instruction and circulars of CBDT which is binding upon al....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ot accept the contention of the assessee and observed that the statement during the assessment proceedings that the confession of undisclosed income is under duress is an afterthought. He, therefore, treated Rs. 19,61,740/- as undisclosed income and added the same to the total income of the assessee. 6. In first appeal, the action of the AO was confirmed. 7. Ld A.R. of the assessee submitted that during the course of assessment proceedings, books of account alongwith bills and vouchers were produced and same were test checked. He submitted that the assessee has not made any transaction with the three parties as claimed by the department. He submitted that during survey proceedings, income tax officers all of a sudden entered the busin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ance of such instances which compel to issue advisory circular that while recording statement during the course of search and seizure and survey operations no attempt should be made to obtained confession to the undisclosed income. 8. Ld A.R. further submitted that the assessee is a contractor and even it assumes that Rs. 19,41,740/- is treated as undisclosed receipts, any business receipts would be treated as contract receipt. Therefore, the entire receipt cannot be added to the total income of the assessee and income embedded therefrom can be added only. Ld A.R. also submitted that the expenditure on the receipts was not considered. 9. Replying to above, ld DR submits that a survey was conducted at the business premises of the asses....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ts are capital in nature then it is not taxable and if receipts are revenue in nature then it must be out of sales or services rendered. It was further explained by the assessee that if these are contract receipts then the assessee must have incurred some expenditure to earn these receipts, therefore, provisions of section 44AD of the Act should be applied and enhancement be only restricted to 8% of impugned amount of Rs. 19,41,740/-. The Assessing Officer dismissed this explanation by observing that during the recording of statement u/s.1334A of the Act, the assessee had admitted/deposited the advance tax of Rs. 6 lakhs on the undisclosed impugned receipts, since he could not explain the source of above receipts, hence, the plea taken by t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nn.com 476 (Delhi) to hold that in absence of any evidence of coercion or undue influence the statements recorded during the survey are admissible evidence. Further, I may point out that the CBDT in the circular dated 10.3.2003 (supra) has directed the revenue authorities that if confession not based upon credible evidence, are later retracted by the concerned assesses while filing the returns of income, such confessions do not serve any useful purpose. 12. In the present case, I am satisfied that there was substantial evidence in the hands of survey team in the form of receipts (Assessee's PB 17,18 & 19). Therefore, statements recorded by the survey team on the basis of such receipts cannot be alleged as not based upon credible evidence....