Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (11) TMI 1013

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....between the parties and the petitioner be permitted to compound the offence. The petitioner has filed Crl. M.P. No. 12801 of 2009, to condone delay of 39 days, caused in filing review application and Crl. M.P. No. 12803 of 2009 to permit him to compound the offence and acquit him by setting aside the conviction recorded in Criminal Case No. 726 of 2003 by the learned Judicial Magistrate Karur. The petitioner has filed another Crl. M.P. No. 12804 of 2009 with a prayer to permit him to produce affidavit sworn by him stating that pursuant to compromise between him and the respondent, he has paid Rs. 4,52,289/- to the respondent as well as affidavit sworn by P. Kaliappan, power of attorney holder of R. Rajathi stating that pursuant to the compr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) No. 6974 of 2008 @ CRL. M.P. No. 14586 of 2008 which was also dismissed on September 11, 2008. Thereafter a compromise was entered into and petitioner claims that he has paid Rs. 4,52,289/- to respondent. In support of this claim, the petitioner has produced affidavit sworn by him on December 1, 2008. The petitioner has also produced affidavit sworn by P. Kaliappan, Power of Attorney holder of R. Rajathi on December 1, 2008 mentioning that he has received a sum of Rs. 4,52,289/- due under the dishonoured cheques in full discharge of the value of cheques and he is not willing to prosecute the petitioner. The Learned Counsel for the petitioner states at the bar that the petitioner was arrested on July 30, 2008 and has undergone the sentence....