Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2021 (7) TMI 103

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s 40(a)(i) of the Act. 1.2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Ld.CIT Appeal has erred in treating the Global Account Coordination Cost as Fees for Technical Services. 1.3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Ld.CIT Appeal has erred in not appreciating that retrospective amendment in law cannot charge the tax withholding liability with retrospective effect unless such services were rendered in India." 2. The facts giving rise to the present case of the assessee are that the case of the assessee was re-opened for assessment and the assessment was framed u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") vide order dated 26.03.2014. While framing the assessment, the Assessing Offi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....4/Mum/2010 for Assessment Year 2010-11 wherein it was held that Coordination fee was not taxable on the ground that the assessee company did not have permanent establishment in India. He further placed reliance on the decision of the Tribunal rendered in the case of M/s. Virola International vide ITA No.256/Agr/2013 for Assessment Year 2008-09. He further placed reliance on the judgement of High Court of Karnataka rendered in the case of M/s. Jindal Thermal Power Company ltd. vide ITA No.3022/2005 to 3025/2005. 6. On the contrary, Ld. DR opposed these submissions and supported the order of authorities below. 7. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material available on record. We find that Ld.CIT(A) has decided the issu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es not come under' technical services' under section 9 of the Act. Therefore. the provision of section 195 is not attracted. However, the A.O has also given a number of judgments and also analysed the nature of services rendered which entails the payment on account of Global Account Co-ordination Cost. I have also taken into account the rationale of Hon'ble ITAT judgment in the appellant's own case on similar issue for A. Y:2007-08. I have also considered the fact that the services rendered by the parent company does come under the purview of technical services if we look at the multilateral agreement. The relevant part about the scope the arrangements as per agreement is reproduced in the earlier para. The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....luding through the provision of services of technical or other personnel) if such services: a) Are ancillary and subsidiary .... ; or b) Make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes or consists of the development and transfer of a technical plan or technical design. Therefore, taking into account factual matrix of the case, it is my considered view that the A.O is justified in disallowing the payment as it had attracted provision of section 195 of the Act which the appellant company had failed to deduct tax at source. Accordingly, the disallowance of Rs. 57,38,948/- on account of Global Account Coordination Cost under section 4O(a)(i) of the Act is upheld. Appellant's ground of ....