Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1985 (12) TMI 12

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the addition of Rs. 38,500 sustained in the assessment year 1969-70 is legal and valid ? " In this case, we are concerned with assessment year 1969-70. The assessee was assessed as individual in the assessment proceeding. The Income-tax Officer added a sum of Rs. 38,500. This sum the assessee claimed was not liable to be added to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....opinion in terms of section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act. It is not in controversy that the disclosure made by the assessee had not been accepted. That not having been accepted, the necessary inference would be that the said sum of Rs. 38,500 was income from undisclosed sources. There could be no other conclusion in that regard. The Income-tax Officer, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and t....