2017 (1) TMI 1754
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nd Jha, Advs. For Respondents: Rajesh Gupta, Harpreet Singh, Puneet Taneja and Pranjal Saran, Advs. JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The Appellants are before this Court aggrieved by the judgment dated 28.2.2012 in RSA No. 250 of 1995 and RSA No. 117 of 1998. The dispute essentially pertains to the claim made by the Appellants and Respondents in respect of two items o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ri, learned senior Counsel appearing for the Appellants, though made a submission that 17 biswas in Sector 4 is much higher in value, on a suggestion that whether the Appellants are prepared to have 17 biswas for themselves and forgo 6 biswas, the answer was in the negative. Mr. Attri, learned senior Counsel, however, submitted that the offer made by the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 may be accepted and ....
TaxTMI