Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (11) TMI 1624

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ce Jaswant Singh And Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sant Parkash For the Petitioner(s) (in both cases) : Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Jaswant Singh, J. (ORAL) [1] This common order will dispose of the above-mentioned two writ petitions bearing CWP Nos. 33146 & 33116 of 2019, as the issues raised in these petitions are identical. [2] The petitioner(s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of pre-deposit before the First Appellate Authority / Deputy Excise & Taxation Commissioner, Ludhiana, who vide two separate orders dated 25.02.2019 (Annexure P-3) dismissed the appeals for non-deposit of the reduced amount of Rs. 10,00,000/- (Ten Lacs only) and Rs. 5,00,000/- (Five Lacs only) for entertaining the appeal(s) for both the assessment years, i.e. 2012-13 & 2013-14, respectively. St....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of the case. [6] Before proceeding further, we had directed the State Counsel to seek instructions on the previous date of hearing, i.e. 16.11.2019. [7] At the time of resumed hearing today, learned State Counsel, on instructions, states that the respondent / Revenue would have no objection for directing the First Appellate Authority to decide both the appeals on merits, provided the petiti....