Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1985 (2) TMI 5

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fit case to prefer an appeal to the Supreme Court against a judgment of this court in CIT v. Assam Oil Co. Ltd. [1982] 133 ITR 204. Learned advocate for the assessee has submitted that the following two substantial questions of general importance arise from the judgment : " (a) Whether a decision of a High Court can constitute information within the meaning of section 147(b) of the Income-tax A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ras Auto Service v. ITO [1975] 101 ITR 589 (Mad); (e) New Kaiser-I-Hind Spinning & Weaving Co. Ltd. (In liquidation) v. CIT [1977] 107 ITR 760 (Bom) and (f) R. Kuppuswamy Mudaliar & Sons v. Board of Revenue (Commercial Taxes) [1980] 45 STC 152 (Mad). The pronouncements in the above decisions do not appear to be uniform. We certify that this is a fit case for appeal to the Supreme Court. Let ....