2021 (5) TMI 719

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Ranu Biswas , Addl. CIT, D. R. ORDER Per Shri P. M. Jagtap , Vice President ( KZ ) This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Kolkata dated 03.04.2019. 2. At the outset, it is noted that there is delay of 186 days on the part of the assessee in filing this appeal before the Tribunal. In this regard, the assessee has move....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Officer at Rs. 42,48,781/- after making addition, inter alia, on account of interest income amounting to Rs. 43,93,116/- by treating the same as undisclosed income of the assessee. 4. Against the order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) of the Act, an appeal was preferred by the assessee before the ld. CIT(Appeals) and since there was no compliance on the part of the assessee ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....such non-receipt of notices resulted in non-compliance on the part of the assessee before the ld. CIT(Appeals). He has also invited our attention to the relevant portion of the impugned order of the ld. CIT(Appeals) to point out that the notices of hearing sent by the ld. CIT(Appeals) were not served on the assessee and the same were returned back 'undelivered' by the Postal Authority. Kee....