2011 (12) TMI 753
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hika Arora, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC with Ms. Gayatri Verma, Adv. for UOI. ORDER C.M. No.19340/2011 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 8554/2011 The present petition is filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for quashing of the notices dated 25.11.2011, 29.11.2011, 30.11.2011 and 1.12.2011 issued to it by re....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... as done in the present case. Notice. Counsel for the respondents/UOI, who appears on advance copy, accepts notice and opposes the present petition and states that the same is not maintainable as the respondents/UOI are well empowered under the Act to institute an investigation and thereby call for such information and places reliance on a number of judgments in support of this submission....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ion is vehemently denied by the learned counsel for the respondents/UOI, who specifically refers to the letter dated 30.11.2011 addressed by respondents No.2 to 4 to the petitioner (Annexure P-1 Colly) to point out that none of the aforesaid documents have been furnished by the petitioner till date, thus compelling the respondents/UOI to issue the impugned summons. He further states that on the ba....
TaxTMI