Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2012 (5) TMI 842

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spondent : S.M. Surana ORDER Per George Mathan : 1. This is an appeal fi led by the Revenue against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-XI I , Kolkata in Appeal No. 225/CIT(A. )-XII/R-12/10-11 dated 01.11.2011 for the assessment year 2008-09. 2. In revenue's appeal, the Revenue has raised the following grounds: - 1. That, on the fact s and in the circumstance ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hane, M.N. Sharfuddin whose credits totalling to Rs. 44,03,180/-. I t was the submission that as the not ices had been returned back 'unserved', and the Assessing Officer had treated the said liability in respect of three persons as bogus liability and added the same to the total income of the assessee. It was the submission that the ld. CIT(Appeals) had deleted the same holding that the addition ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....early shows that ld. CIT(Appeals) had taken into consideration the fact that the assessee was having continuous transactions with the said three persons and they are also registered in sales tax. The assessee is having VAT No. and the payments to them were through account payee cheques. This finding of the ld. CIT(Appeals) has not been disputed by the revenue or shown to be perverse. In the circum....