Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (1) TMI 1880

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rnment Pleader ORDER The petitioner's husband Velusamy Konar was the proprietor of M/s.Kannan Chemicals. He was a dealer registered with the respondent. He passed away in the year 2001. In respect of the assessment year 1997-98 and 1998-99, the pre-revision notices dated 29.08.2002 were served on the petitioner's daughter Meena on 02.09.2002. An enquiry was held and the petitioner&#3....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....id order was questioned in the manner known to law. The affidavit filed in support of the Writ petition is also silent. The petitioner has woken up only after the recovery action was taken. What is under challenge in this order is only the auction notice dated 27.07.2011. When the primary order has not been set aside or stayed in the manner known to law, the challenge to the consequential recovery....