TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2020 (5) TMI 678
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... V.P. J. ORDER The applicant has filed the stay application for urgent hearing of extension of stay against recovery of outstanding demand. Thereafter, the applicant also filed the stay application seeking stay of balance outstanding demand relating to Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The stay application was heard through Video Conferencing facility. The case of the Ld.AR for the applicant before ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ns of comparables and there would not be any need to go into the aspect of the applicant was a BPO or KPO. He also pointed Out that two additions have been made one is on account of TP adjustment of Rs. 5.47 crores and the second of Rs. 2,62,072/- u/s 37(1) of the Act. He pointed out that the last stay order Was passed on ()9.03.2020, which has now expired and there is urgency for granting stay. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ase of extension of stay and not grant of stay. 5. We have heard both parties through video co n ferencing plat form and perused the stay application filed by the applicant. This application was moved seeking extension of stay granted to the applicant. The last stay order which was granted to 09.03.2020 under which no conditions were imposed. The stay was extended to 60 days i.e. ending on 08.05.....