2021 (4) TMI 699

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Tax<br>HON&#39;BLE SHRI P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, CHIEF JUSTICE HON&#39;BLE SHRI JUSTICE PARTH PRATEEM SAHU, JUDGE For Appellant : Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondents : Shri Ramakant Mishra, Assistant Solicitor General. Judgment on Board Per Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 10.02.2021 passed in Writ Petition (T) No. 13 of 2021,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the period provided under the Act of 1994 for recovery of the service tax. Lastly, he submits that the notice issued is predetermined, the authorities have fixed the amount of service tax hence no purpose will be served in submitting reply to the notice before the department. He submits that the learned Single Judge has not taken into consideration all the points raised by the Appellant and hen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that the Appellant is asked to show the cause as to why the Rs. 49,49,344/- could not be demanded from the Appellant under the provisions of the Act of 1994. &nbsp; 4. We heard the learned counsel for the parties. 5. Going through the provision under the Act of 1994 and the contents of the notice, we find that the notice is a show cause notice served upon the Appellant under Section 73(1) of....