Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1987 (9) TMI 25

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....This is an application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act "). The material facts giving rise to this application, briefly, are as follows : The assessee is a firm and the assessment year in question is 1977-78, for which the accounting year ended on Diwali, 1976. The assessee-firm consisted of three partners, namely, Shri Ramsahai, Shri Nath....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erefore, the assessee should have applied for fresh registration in Form No. 11A. The Income-tax Officer, therefore, refused registration and made a single assessment for both the periods treating the assessee as an unregistered firm. On appeal, the order passed by the Income-tax Officer was affirmed. The appeal preferred by the assessee before the Tribunal was dismissed and the assessee sought re....