Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2021 (4) TMI 40

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the assessee is engaged in the business of gold, cut and polished diamond, manufacture of diamond studded jewellery and export and local sales of such jewellery. For the assessment year under dispute, assessee filed its return of income on 10-09-2011 declaring total income ofRs. 11,50,130/-. The return of income so filed was initially processed under section 143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, the assessing officer received information from the investigation wing that in course of search and seizure operations conducted in case of Shri Bhanwarlal Jain and his group concerns on 03-10-2013, it was found that they were providing accommodation entries in the form of unsecured loans, bogus purchase bills, etc through number of entities within t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e of purchase is doubted but the genuineness of purchase is not doubted, the assessing officer observed that in such cases only the profit element embedded in the transaction would be brought to tax. Thus, ultimately, he estimated the profit element at 5% of the alleged non genuine purchases and added back an amount ofRs. 14,66,144/- to the total income of the assessee. Though, the assessee contested the aforesaid disallowance/addition, however, learned Commissioner (Appeals) upheld it. 4. Learned Authorised Representative submitted, purely on the basis of information obtained in case of a third party the assessing officer has treated the purchases as non genuine. He submitted, to prove the genuineness of purchases, the assessee had furn....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....assessee has demonstrated the corresponding sales against the disputed purchases. Therefore, the assessing officer has ultimately disallowed 5% of the alleged non genuine purchases. Now, the issue before me is only confined to the reasonableness of the disallowance made at 5% of the non genuine purchases. On a perusal of the report of the Task Group for Diamond Sector under the aegis of Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce, Government of India, New Delhi in the year 2013, it is noticed that as per the benign assessment procedure (BAP) introduced in the budget presented in 2007-08, the threshold net profit rate was fixed at 8% which was subsequently revised to 6% as per CBDT Instruction No.2/2008 dated 22-02-2008. Consid....