2021 (3) TMI 1076
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ APPELLANT (BY SRI. ADITYA SONDHI, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. SANDEEP HUILGOL, ADVOCATE-PH) RESPONDENT (BY SRI.K. HEMA KUMAR, AGA-PH) JUDGMENT SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA. J., 1. The appellant before this Court has filed the present Writ Appeal being aggrieved by the order dated 28.01.2020 passed in W.P.No.1969/2020 (Mesha Engineering Industry Pvt. Ltd., vs. De....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....erein to offer explanation to the notices issued. 3. The learned counsel for the appellant has argued before this Court that the controversy involved in the present case stands concluded on the account of the judgment delivered in STRP No.82/2018 dated 26.02.2021 (The State of Karnataka vs. M/s.Tallam Apparels) and therefore, now it is an empty formality in passing the final order. W.A. NO.157 ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 14. The reason why ordinarily a writ petition should not be entertained against a mere show-cause notice or charge-sheet is that at that stage the writ petition may be held to be premature. A mere charge-sheet or show-cause notice does not give rise to any cause of action, because it does not amount to an adverse order which affects the rights of any party unless the same has been issued by....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....and therefore, the question of interfering with the show cause notice does not arise. 6. In the light of the aforesaid judgment delivered by the Hon'ble Apex Court, learned Single Judge was justified in dismissing the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a reply to the show cause notices and therefore, this Court does not find reason to interfere in the order passed by the l....
TaxTMI