Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1987 (9) TMI 15

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Income-tax Act, 1961, are at the instance of the Revenue in respect of the same assessee for the assessment years 1969-70 and 1970-71, for answering the following questions of law, namely: Assessment year 1969-70 "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in cancelling the penalty order passed under section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....5,19,370. The Wealth-tax Officer initiated penalty proceedings under section 18( 1 )(c) of the Wealth-tax Act and referred the case for levy of penalty to the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Wealth-tax on December 16, 1976. By an order dated March 2, 1977, the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner imposed penalty of Rs. 3,70,333. Similarly for the assessment year 1970-71, the wealth-tax return wa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975 and its substitution by new subsection (3). Hence these references at the instance of the Revenue. We have already held in a number of income-tax matters relating to imposition of penalty under section 27](1)(c) read with section 274 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, that after the amendment made in section 274 by the deletion of sub-section (2) thereof by the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-tax matters involving the same point following the view taken in CIT v. Shri Rant Prakash Saraf [1986] 160 ITR 860 (MP). The same view his to be taken in respect of the corresponding provisions in the Wealth-tax Act also. It follows that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner in respect of both these assessment years had no jurisdiction to impose penalty after the above change in the Wealth-tax....