2010 (3) TMI 1259

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... S.S.Rana ORDER Per R.S.Syal, J. This appeal by the assessee is against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) on 30.1.2009 in relation to the assessment year 2005-2006. 2. The first ground is against the reopening of the assessment. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the assessee filed its return declaring total income at Rs. 1,07,10,220 on 29.11.2000.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The following reason has been noted by the Assessing Officer. "On going through the records of the assessee company for A.Y. 2000-01 it is seen that there was balance of MODVAT Credit in RG23 part-KII of Rs. 2,09,274/- as reported in tax audit report. However it is noticed that the balance of MODVAT credit of Rs. 2,09,274 at the end of the year has not been included in the closing stock....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... all material facts necessary for the assessment." 4. From the reasons for reopening as recorded above, it is seen that the Assessing Officer proceeded to make reassessment on account of Modvat credit of Rs. 2.09 lakhs which was not included in the value of closing stock. It is seen that the reference to such amount of Rs. 2.09 lakhs was reported in Tax Audit Report. The first proviso to sectio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... u/s.143(3) was completed on 26.3.2003. From the reasons for reopening extracted above it is seen that there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts qua the Modvat credit of Rs. 2.09 lakhs as the same was part of Tax Audit Report annexed to the Balance Sheet filed along with the return of income. The period of four years from the end of the relevan....