2019 (11) TMI 1595
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....HARIEF TARIQ Judicial Member and K. K. VOHRA Technical Member Anil Koushik and Uttam Datt for the petitioner. Ranya Gayathri for the voluntary liquidator. Mayank Bughani and Arushi Sralech for the objector-Tata Projects Ltd. ORDER Counsel for the appellant/applicant is present. Counsel for the respondent/liquidator is present. The applicant has prayed to set aside the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Counsel for the applicant has referred to the letter of rejection wherein it is clearly brought out by the liquidator that balance amount of Rs. 16,18,118 is due and payable to the applicant but for certain reasons best known to the liquidator the claim was rejected with the request to the appellants/applicant to approach appropriate authority for the claim of rest of the amount against the compa....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... devoid of merits and stands rejected. In terms of the above, the application is allowed. The liquidator is directed to admit the claim of the appellant/applicant as per form B, which has already been filed by the applicant. The compliance will be made within 10 working days giving an intimation to the applicant. Consequently, the letter of rejection dated May 14, 2019 stands set aside to the exte....
TaxTMI