2021 (3) TMI 583

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dvocates for R-4. Ms. Ankita Bajpai , Advocate ORDER ( Virtual Mode ) Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant. Learned Counsel submits that this Appeal has been filed as the Appellant was aggrieved by non-payment of his salary and illegal actions by the Resolution Professional. The Appellant claims that the Appellant had filed C.A.1194/2019 before the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh) for payment of his salary or for inclusion of his salary expenses as CIRP cost in the Resolution Plan and later Appeal was filed before this Tribunal, which remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 681 of 2020 (Annexure A-2) as resolution plan was still pending adjudication. I....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ave been duly paid. 4. The Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 referred to earlier Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 101 of 2021 (Annexure A11 -Page 385) which was filed by the Appellant and it has been disposed. The Order reads as under: "17.02.2021: The Resolution Plan approved by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Chandigarh Bench in respect of the Corporate Debtor in terms of the impugned order dated 12th January, 2021 is being assailed in the instant appeal by the Appellant- Mr. Sundeep Thakur who is represented by Mr. Anirudh, Advocate. On a query being put to him as to whether the claim of the Appellant as workman/ employee has been admitted or rejected, he sought time to address this Appellate Tri....