CIT-A Lacked Jurisdiction in Issuing 50 Orders, Ignoring DGIT Directions; Actions Prejudicial to Revenue Interests.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Orders passed by CIT-A without proper jurisdiction - the very action of then Ld. CIT(A)in ignoring the binding directions given by DGIT and proceeding to pass orders results serious lapse on his part in administering justice. We also notice that all the orders impugned in these appeals have been passed between 5.7.2018 and 13.7.2018, numbering around 50 orders, involving different Assessees and different issues, which is difficult task for any appellate authority. Hence we agree with the submission of Ld. Standing Counsel that the interests of revenue is prejudiced by the said action of the then Ld. CIT(A) - AT....