Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (11) TMI 1588

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....19 - -<br>CST, VAT & Sales Tax<br>T. S. SIVAGNANAM&nbsp;and MRS. R. THARANI&nbsp;JJ. T. Bashyam&nbsp;&nbsp;for the petitioner. S. Angappan&nbsp;, Government Advocate for the respondents. ORDER Heard Mr.T. Bashyam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Angappan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 2. By consent on either side, these writ petitions are tak....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of the Hon&#39;ble Calcutta High Court affirming the view expressed by the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal and disposing of the appeal preferred by the dealer along with other connected appeals holding, inter alia, that the assessee, the Calcutta Club Limited, was not liable for payment of sales tax under the provision of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994. The Hon&#39;ble Supreme Court by judgmen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....beverages by the incorporated clubs to its permanent members constitute sale thereby holding the same to be liable to sales tax?" 5. Subsequently, the matter was placed before the Larger Bench of the Hon&#39;ble Supreme Court, by judgment, which by order dated 03.10.2019 held as follows: "49. In light of the view that we have taken, it is unnecessary to advert to Shri Dwivedi&#39;s arguments th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al dated 3rd July, 2006 and the impugned Calcutta High Court judgment dated 1st February, 2008, and in view of the answers to the three questions referred to the present Three Judge Bench (as listed hereinabove). We are of the view that no interference is called for in the findings of fact or declaration of law in this case. Accordingly, C.A.No.4184 of 2009 stands dismissed." 6. In the light of t....