Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2014 (3) TMI 1174

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unsel For the Respondent : Mr. Salil Aggarwal with Mr. Ravi Pratap, Advocates. ORDER The revenue claims to be aggrieved by a common order of the ITAT for assessment years 1993-94 and 1994-95. It deleted the imposition of penalty upon the assessee. The assessee claimed interest deduction of Rs. 79,44,830/- and Rs. 1,02,82,883/- for the assessment years 1993-94 and 1994-95 respectively, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 28.02.2011, where this Court held that when a question of law is framed in respect of the issue, the matter can be said to be debatable so far as the application of Section 271(1)(c) is concerned, held that the penalties were not warranted. It also noticed that this Court had directed the penalty to be deleted in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Liquid Investment and Trading Co., ITA No.240/2009 de....