2016 (4) TMI 1402
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r. Manan Verma, Advocates For Respondent(s): Mr. Vivekanand Mishra, Advocate for R-1 Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Advocate for R-2 MR. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J. The present is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), essentially impugning the issuance of summons dated 19.03.2016, under Section 108 of the Customs....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....of any information as to why he has been called. In my considered view, the impugned summons is ex facie unsustainable. Consequently, the summons dated 19.03.2016 is set aside and quashed. Mr. Satish Aggarwala, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the DRI, in response to a specific query from this Court, states that he is not aware about any proceeding pending against the petitioner at thi....
TaxTMI