1988 (8) TMI 55

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t the instance of the assessee, to answer the following questions of law, namely: " 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a correct interpretation of law, the allowance in question received by the assessee was wrong application of the privy purse received by the Ruler, Maharana Bhagwat Singhji of Mewar ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s justified in holding that the Hath-Kharcha allowance received by the assessee from her son, H. H. Maharana Bhagwat Singhji of Udaipur, karta of the family out of privy purse was liable to income-tax in the hands of the assessee ? 6 Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the allowances in question were not received by....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is reported as Deceased junior Rajmata Smt. Gulab Kanwar by legal representative Arvind Singh v. CIT [1986] 160 ITR 908. The Division Bench deciding that reference had reframed the questions referred into one question which covers the points involved for decision in all these questions. The question for decision really is the liability to tax in the hands of the Rajmata of the amount paid by the M....