2021 (2) TMI 258

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cal) Shri S. Murugappan, Advocate for the Appellant Shri Balakumar, AC (AR) for the Respondent ORDER Per Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S. The above ROM application has been filed by the appellant seeking to rectify the error apparent in the Final Order No. 40817/2020 dated 26.10.2020. 2. On behalf of the appellant, ld. Counsel Shri S. Murugappan submitted that in para 2 of the Final Order, the classif....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....appellant and 85176990 by the department. However, by mistake the classification confirmed by the department has been noted as 85176290 in the last sentence of para 2. This is an error apparent on the face of record which requires rectification. We hereby order that the classification mentioned in last sentence of para 2 be substituted as 85176990 instead of 85176290. 6. The second contention put....