Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (12) TMI 1446

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... AO's order dated AO's order under Section 70/Ran/19 Anup Kumar Chatterjee 2005-06 30.07.19 30.12.11 153A r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act (in short 'the Act') 71/Ran/19 -Do- 2006-07 -Do- -Do- -Do- 72/Ran/19 -Do- 2007-08 -Do- -Do- -Do- 73/Ran/19 -Do- 2008-09 -Do- -Do- -Do- 74/Ran/19 -Do- 2010-11 -Do- -Do- 143(3) of the Act 2. At the beginning of the hearing, it was stated on behalf of the assessee that all the five matters captioned above are inter-connected and involves common issue. Accordingly, all matters were heard together for adjudication purposes. 3. We shall take assessee's appeal in IT(SS)A No. 70/Ran/2019 c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....peal were passed in the second round under s.153A of the Act pursuant to the directions of the ITAT in the first round of hearing. The assessment order passed under s.153A/144 r.w.s. 254 of the Act dated 27.10.2016 is subject matter of challenge. It was pointed out by the learned AR for the assessee that in the second round of proceedings before the AO pursuant to directions of the ITAT for fresh adjudication after giving proper opportunity to the assessee, the AO has passed the assessment order without taking approval mandated under s.153D of the Act. It was contended that lack of approval under s.153D of the Act would invalidate the assessment order which is not curable defect as held by the co-ordinate bench of Tribunal in Ashok Kumar Ag....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ix assessment years. Further, sec.153D mandates that, No order of assessment or reassessment shall be passed by an Assessing Officer below the rank of Joint Commissioner in respect of each assessment year referred to in sec.153A. The whole purpose and legislative intention behind this safeguard is to see that the AO being a lower authority, should not pass any high pitched order so as to put the assesses to unnecessary hardship. Further, sec.153D also provides that no approval of Joint commissioner is required, where the assessment order is required to be passed with prior approval of commissioner u/s. 144BA. The purpose and import of excluding the approval of Joint commissioner u/s.144BA is that when a superior authority is involved in dir....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and the AO was entitled to make the assessment afresh without any fetter, all the provisions of the Act requires to be applied in the same manner as would be applicable in the first round of assessment. We therefore are of the opinion that the CIT(A) was incorrect in rejecting the appeal of the assessee taking shelter of Section 144BA of the Act. It is trite that where the AO is required to do a particular act in a particular manner, he cannot bypass the mandate of law and adopt a different approach. The supervisory power mandated under s.153D of the Act in case of search assessment could not be bypassed. The co-ordinate bench in D. S. India Jewelmart P Ltd. (supra) has taken note of various judicial decisions and arrived at conclusion that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h of Patna High Court delivered in the case of Smt. Tej Kumari Vrs. Commissioner of Income-tax reported in [2001] the interest cannot be levied over the assessed income and it can be levied only on the income declared in the return. The revenue preferred SLP before Hon'ble Supreme Court against the said judgment of the Full Bench of Patna High Court, which was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on merits vide order dated 01.08.2000 by saying that there is no merit in the appeal. 24. Learned counsel for the revenue could not dispute this legal position. Therefore, so far as question of law involved in this appeal that whether the interest could have been levied against the assessed income of the assessee under Sections 2....