Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1988 (1) TMI 5

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the direction of this court under section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, in Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 522 of 1981, decided on November 19, 1982, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has stated the case and referred the following question of law for this court's opinion : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in cancelling the p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Officer also levied a penalty of Rs. 1,075 for the assessment year 1973-74, which is not the subject-matter of this reference. The assessee went up in appeals before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, who disposed of the appeals for the years 1971-72 to 1973-74 by a common order. The explanation of the assessee that he was under a bona fide belief that only his capital in the firm was subject ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Act, the aforesaid question was directed to be referred to this court. This question is directly covered by the decision of this court in Sardar Pritam Singh v. CIT [1985] 154 ITR 133. "Notice issued to show cause why penalty be not imposed-Prayer for adjournment of proceedings granted-Assessee not appearing on the date fixed Order imposing penalty passed Tribunal justified in holding that asses....